IBC Amendment Explained: Why Personal Guarantors in Pending Cases Should Be Worried
The IBC Amendment Act, 2026 removes the interim moratorium for personal guarantors — and both NCLT New Delhi and the Bombay High Court have confirmed it applies retroactively to cases already pending.

A quiet but significant change took effect on May 26, 2026: the interim moratorium available to personal guarantors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was removed — and two separate rulings since then have made clear that the change doesn't just apply going forward.
What the interim moratorium was doing
When a personal guarantor to a corporate debtor faced insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings, an interim moratorium automatically kicked in, pausing creditor action against the guarantor's personal assets. In practice, this became a structural loophole: promoters who had personally guaranteed corporate debt could initiate personal insolvency proceedings against themselves largely to trigger this moratorium, stalling creditors even while the corporate insolvency process continued separately.
What changed
The IBC Amendment Act, 2026 removes the availability of that interim moratorium — regardless of whether the proceedings are initiated by the creditor or the guarantor-debtor. That closes the specific mechanism financially sophisticated promoters had been using as a delay tactic.
The part that actually stings: retroactive application
Two rulings have now confirmed the amendment isn't just prospective. NCLT New Delhi held that the removal applies to proceedings already pending, and the Bombay High Court separately confirmed the same for pending Section 95 cases. That means personal guarantors who filed or faced proceedings before the amendment, expecting the moratorium protection that existed when they filed, lose that protection mid-case.
The rest of the package
The amendment didn't stop at removing the moratorium. It also introduced a mandatory creditors' meeting requirement for personal guarantor repayment plans, and capped government dues at two years in these cases — with mandatory escalation to bankruptcy if delays persist. Together, these close off the broader set of delay mechanisms that had built up around personal guarantor insolvency.
What this means if you're a personal guarantor
If you're a promoter or director who personally guaranteed corporate debt and have a proceeding currently pending, the interim moratorium you may have been relying on is gone — retroactively. That's a materially different risk position than it was before May 2026, and worth an immediate conversation with insolvency counsel if it applies to you.
Sources: Bar & Bench · LiveLaw — NCLT New Delhi · LiveLaw — Bombay High Court